After the recent E. coli O157:H7 outbreak linked to Bravo raw milk gouda cheese that sickened 38 (one with HUS), the New York Times is quickly becoming the go to newspaper for cheese lovers.
Bill Neuman wrote yet another article on cheese – “Raw Milk Cheesemakers Fret Over Possible New Rules” – after Food Safety News reported it and in follow-up to my five part series on raw milk and the “60 day rule” – Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4 and Part 5, and the continuing outbreaks, illnesses and recalls linked to raw (unpasteurized) and pasteurized dairy products in the United States. He did note in his article from the FDA Inspection Report – Observation 2 that Bravo packaged cheese for shipment BEFORE the 60 days had run.
Mr. Neuman last year also penned – “As Cheesemaking Blooms, So Can Listeria” and “Small Cheesemaker Defies F.D.A. Over Recall” – following a Listeria recall linked to Estrella Family Creamery (See Inspection) and an E. coli O157:H7 outbreak linked to Sally Jackson Cheese (See Inspection) – both producers from the state of Washington. Here is my full series on the 60 Day Rule:
The Raw Milk Beat Goes On: A Look at the Literature and the 60-Day Raw Milk Cheese Aging Rule
Introduction
Some say raw milk cheeses are being beat-up by US regulators this year. Indeed, if there was a Food Safety Zodiac, 2010 would be the Year of the Cheese (shell eggs a close second). Whatever the underlying explanation, the number of cheese-related illnesses and recalls in 2010 appears unprecedented. While covering these events, my blog has been inundated with comments expressing outrage at FDA and state regulators for raw milk cheese “crackdowns.” The comments range from fringe screams about food Nazis and fascists to thoughtful and informative discussions about the microbiology of raw milk cheeses and implications for food safety and quality.
Tami Parr of the Pacific Northwest Cheese Association portended regulatory changes that may affect the fate of raw milk cheeses on her blog earlier last month. Interestingly, she links to a 1997 memo that recommended FDA re-examine its 60-day aging process for hard cheeses made from raw milk. No changes were made to the rule at that time, but clearly the issue of aged raw milk cheeses and food safety is not new, as shown in the timeline below.
To look at the issue closer, this paper provides an overview of the historical context and timeline of raw milk cheese regulations in the US, and examines the state-of-the-science surrounding the 60-day aging rule established by FDA. I have broken it into 5 parts for ease of reading. At the end of part 5, I will provide the entire paper in PDF.I welcome comments, suggestions, and additional literature from readers to add to the analysis.
Historical Perspective
Timeline of Key Studies and Regulatory Changes for Cheeses Made from Raw Milk
1941-1944: Typhoid fever epidemics are linked to cheddar cheese made from raw milk in Canada; outbreak-related Salmonella typhi strains are recovered from 30-day-old cheese, but not from 48- or 63-day-old cheese resulting in Alberta, Canada halting the sale of raw milk cheese unless ripened for at least 90 days (Marth 1969).
1946: Brucella abortus is found to survive in cheddar cheese made from raw milk for up to 6 months depending on initial inoculation level, but the authors of the study conclude that cheddar cheese is not a proven carrier of undulant fever (the human disease caused by B. abortus). D’Amico (2008a) suggests that this study, combined with the earlier data on typhoid fever illnesses not attributed to cheese cured for more than 63 days, is the likely origin of the 60-day curing period in the US. However, subsequent reports in the 1940s show extended survival of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (>100 days), Salmonella typhi (3-10 months), and hemolytic Streptococcus (>160 days) in cheddar cheese (D’Amico 2008a).
1950: FDA promulgates regulations (21 CFR Section 133) requiring that cheesemakers use pasteurized milk, or cure the cheese for no less than 60 days at a temperature greater than 35°F. According to D’Amico (2008a), there are over 30 natural cheeses that can be made legally from raw milk in the US under this rule.
1960s: Additional challenge studies show survival of pathogens including Salmonella enterica subtype Typhimurium beyond the 60 day curing period; Salmonella typhi is found to survive in stirred curd granular cheddar cheese for 150-180 days when held at refrigeration temperatures (D’Amico 2008a).
1987: Numerous foodborne illnesses are linked to commercial fluid raw milk including 22 deaths from Salmonella Dublin infections from 1971-1975 (Werner 1979). This prompts a Citizen’s Petition and federal judge’s ruling that orders the FDA to ban fluid raw milk and milk products from interstate commerce (21 CFR Section 1240.61). The regulations allowing cheesemakers to sell cheese made with raw milk if cured for 60 days at a temperature greater than 35°F remain in place (21 CFR Section 133).
1973-1992: CDC reviews reported outbreaks and illnesses from raw milk (Headrick 1998) and cheeses made from raw milk (Altekreuse 1998). During this time, there were 32 reported cheese-associated outbreaks and 58 deaths, but the authors conclude that “If current Food and Drug Administration sanitary requirements for cheesemaking had been met, these outbreaks would have been preventable.” They go on to say: “Curing cheeses kills most bacteria present in cheeses; however, evidence from sources other than the CDC Foodborne Disease Outbreak Surveillance System suggests that curing alone may not be a sufficient pathogen control step to eliminate Salmonella, Listeria, and E. coli O157:H7 from cheese.”
1996: Researchers at South Dakota State University publish a study showing that 60-day aging is largely ineffectual in reducing levels of E. coli O157:H7 in cheddar cheese. FDA then asks the National Advisory Committee for Microbiological Criteria for Food (NACMCF) to re-examine the literature on the efficacy of 60-day aging. In a memo to FDA, the committee states: “the sixty-day aging process for hard cheese is questionable as an effective measure in support of the public’s health.”
2002: Health officials from Alberta, Canada report an outbreak of E. coli O157:H7 hemorrhagic colitis associated with Gouda cheese made from raw milk (Honish 2005). In their paper, the authors suggest that Canada re-evaluate the federal regulations for aging of hard cheeses made from raw milk.
2004: In an interview with Food Safety Magazine, FDA officials state that they are developing a “risk profile for raw milk cheeses, which will aid in the Agency’s assessment of the requirements for processing these cheeses,” based, in part, on the report by the NACMCF and other recent research suggesting that 60-day aging may be insufficient to protect the public’s health (Sheehan 2004).
2006: Schlesser and colleagues report results from a study of E. coli O157:H7 survival in cheddar cheese made from raw milk, and confirm previous reports questioning the efficacy of 60-day aging to eliminate E. coli O157:H7 during cheese ripening.
2008: D’Amico and colleages determine that the 60-day aging requirement does not ensure safety of surface-mold-ripened soft cheeses manufactured from raw or pasteurized milk when Listeria monocytogenes is introduced as a postprocessing contaminant. The authors conclude that “the safety of cheeses of this type must be achieved through control strategies other than aging, and thus revision of current federal regulations is warranted.”
2010: According to press quotes, FDA officials are conducting a nationwide survey of cheese safety with a focus on Listeria monocytogenes contamination. Notably, this survey encompasses both raw and pasteurized cheese products from large and small cheesemakers.
In November, the CDC reports 38 illnesses from Gouda cheese made from raw milk and aged for 60 days in accordance with regulations (CDC, 2010).
A study in the December 1, 2010 issue of the Journal of Food Protection documents survival of E. coli O157:H7 in aged Gouda and stirred-curd cheddar cheese (D’Amico 2010). The authors conclude that “the 60-day aging requirement is based on decades-old research indicating that Brucella abortus is eliminated in cheddar cheese alone is insufficient to completely eliminate levels of viable E. coli O157:H7 in Gouda or stirred-curd cheddar cheese manufactured from raw milk contaminated with low levels of this pathogen.”
Definitions
Before embarking on a discussion of the 60-day curing criteria for cheeses made from raw milk, it is important to understand the definition of cheese styles and differences in regulation. Cheese was originally developed by human societies as a method to preserve milk. In the US, cheeses are usually made from cow’s, goat’s, sheep’s, or buffalo’s milk. Among 72 different cheese and cheese product types defined in 21 C.F.R. Part 133, the FDA allows only a limited number of cheese types to be made with raw milk so long as the cheese is cured at a temperature of not less than 35°F for not less than 60 days. The Raw Milk Cheesemakers’ Association adds an additional criteria for low-temperature (thermised) heat treatment of raw milk cheese: ”Cheese produced from milk that, prior to setting the curd, has not been heated above the temperature of the milk (104°F, 40°C) at the time of milking and that the cheese produced from that milk shall be aged for 60 days or longer at a temperature of not less than 35°F (2°C) in accordance with US FDA regulations.” Table 1 summarizes cheeses and cheese types subject to the 60-day aging rule.
Cheese and Cheese Products in the US (adapted from The American Cheese Society) Application of the 60-Day Aging Rule
Fresh cheeses: 60-day aging rule not allowed. Italian style mascarpone and ricotta, chevre, feta, cream cheese, quark and cottage cheese, queso freso and other Mexican-style fresh cheeses.
Soft-ripened cheeses: 60-day rule allowed. Brie and camembert styles, triple crèmes.
Semi-soft cheeses: 60-day aging rule allowed. Blue cheeses, colby, fontina styles, havarti and Monterey Jack, washed rind cheeses. Firm/hard cheeses: 60-day aging rule allowed. Gouda styles, most cheddars, dry jack, Swiss (Emmenthaler) styles, Gruyere styles, many “tomme” styles and Parmesan styles.
Blue cheeses: 60-day aging rule allowed. French (roquefort), Italian (gorgonzola) and Danish blue styles.
Pasta Filata cheeses: 60-day aging rule not allowed. Italian style Mozzarella, Provolone, and Scamorza.
Natural or washed rind cheeses: 60-day aging rule allowed. French Tomme de Savoie and Mimolette, as well as the English Stilton (also a blue), and Lancashire cheeses (natural); Epoisses, Livarot and Taleggio (washed). Processed cheeses: 60-day aging rule not applicable. American Cheese, processed cheese spreads, and “cheese flavored” spreads. Regulation of Raw Milk Cheeses in Other Countries
Canada regulates cheeses made from raw milk similar to the US, except for Quebec where raw milk cheeses can be manufactured without 60-day aging if strict rules for milk quality and veterinary inspections of cattle herds are followed. In 1996, following an outbreak of E. coli O157:H7 linked to cured Gouda cheese, Health Canada proposed a ban on all raw milk cheeses, but the initiative was defeated by industry and consumer groups (Honish 2005).
The European Union has no aging rule, but their requirements for hygiene during milking, storing, and collection of milk for cheesemaking are likely much stricter than in the US. Additionally, requirements for both animal health and worker/personnel health help ensure safe raw milk cheese production. Cheeses made from raw milk in Europe must be labeled “Made with Raw Milk.”
The regulation of raw milk cheeses in Australia and New Zealand has been an area of intense controversy in recent years. Australia bans all domestic raw milk cheeses, but allows importation of certain cheeses–Roquefort, Gruyere, Sbrinz, Emmental–from Europe and Switzerland provided they are aged 90 days and meeting European safety standards (Standard 4.2.4A). Domestic cheeses must be “thermised” by using a low temperature heat treatment followed by aging for 90-days.
Epidemiology
The epidemiology of cheese-related outbreaks has changed in the US since the 60-day aging rule was established in 1950. The studies conducted in the 1940s that presumably provided the basis for the rule were based on diseases such as Typhoid fever, an infection transmitted by human carriers. Today, most of the cheese-linked illnesses are due to zoonotic enteric pathogens carried by ruminants including Campylobacter, E. coli O157:H7, Listeria monocytogenes, and Salmonella. L. monocytogenes is also a ubiquitous inhabitant of the dairy environment.
Dairy-related Outbreaks Attributed to Raw Milk Cheese
Internationally, dairy-related outbreaks are relatively uncommon in developed countries, but an estimated 11.8 percent are attributed to cheeses made from raw milk (FSANZ 2006). Foodborne disease outbreaks have been reported in all countries that allow raw milk cheese including France where raw milk cheeses are popular (Desenclos 1996; Desenclos 1996; DeValk 2000; Dominguez 2009; Haeghebaert 2003; Ostyn 2010). The most recent published review in the US examined reported cheese-related outbreaks and illnesses from 1973 – 1992 (Altekruse 1998). Fresh Mexican-style cheeses (for example, queso fresco) were the most frequently implicated vehicle and caused 56 of the 58 deaths described in the review; the other 2 deaths were linked to improper pasteurization of Mozzarella cheese.
Bacterial Pathogens That Can Survive in Cheeses Aged for 60 Days
Brucella spa.: incubation 1-2 months or longer; duration, may relapse for years; signs and symptoms, fever, headache, joint pain, depression, weight loss. Can cause abortions in dairy animals.
Campylobacter: incubation, 2-5 days; duration, 2-7 days, some patients develop paralytic syndrome as a long-term complication; symptoms, diarrhea (sometimes bloody), cramps, fever, nausea, vomiting, muscle aches. Found in healthy dairy animals.
E. coli O157 and other pathogenic E. coli: incubation, 2-8 days; duration, 5-8 days, some patients develop kidney disease or other long-term complications; symptoms, diarrhea (often bloody), cramps, sometimes low-grade fever. Found in healthy dairy animals.
Listeria monocytogenes: incubation, 3-70 days (average 3 weeks); duration, variable depending on susceptibility, death rate in patients with meningitis as high as 80 percent, septicemia as high as 50 percent; symptoms, septicemia, meningitis, intra-uterine infections in pregnant women with spontaneous abortions and stillbirths. Found in healthy dairy animals and the dairy processing environment
Mycobacterium bovis: incubation, 4-12 weeks to positive tuberculin test, 1-2 years for systemic infection; duration, years, may persist lifetime as latent infection; symptoms, pulmonary and extra-pulmonary disease. Systemic illness in cattle, transmitted through milk and aerosols.
Salmonella enteric: incubation, 6 – 48 hours; duration, 2-8 days, some patients develop long-term complications including arthritic disease; symptoms, diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, cramps fever. Some strains cause illness in dairy animals.
Salmonella typhi: incubation, 8-14 days; duration, variable, case fatality of 10-20 percent without antibiotic treatment; symptoms, fever, cramps, diarrhea, anorexia. Human carriers.
Staphylococcus enterotoxin: incubation, 2-4 hours; duration,1-3 days; symptoms , vomiting, nausea, cramping. Animal and human carriers; toxin produced following growth in a food.
The problem with fresh, soft cheeses is ongoing and most often associated with use of inadequately pasteurized milk and cross-contamination in the processing environment (CDC 2000; CDC 2001; CDC 2008; CDC 2009; Cody 1999; MacDonald 2005; Villar 1999). Listeria monocytogenes and Salmonella are pathogens most often found in fresh Mexican-style soft cheeses as reviewed previously (Marler, 2009). Over the last decade, there have been only two deaths from cheese made with raw milk; both occurred in 2003, and were due to consumption of contaminated fresh (un-aged) queso fresco Mexican-style cheese (CDC OutbreakNet).
In contrast, outbreaks and illnesses linked to 60-day aged cheese are relatively rare despite microbiological evidence of pathogen survival in these cheeses (Altekruse 1998; D’Amico 2008b; D’Amico 2010; Donnelly 1990; Jaros 2008; Reitsma 12996; Schlesser 2006). Researchers from the University of Vermont have speculated that the relative paucity of outbreaks and illnesses associated with 60-day aged cheese may be due to 1) a low contamination level in milk used for cheesemaking or 2) alterations in virulence of pathogens within the cheese matrix (D’Amico 2010).
However, there are notable exceptions including E. coli O157:H7 outbreaks linked to cured Gouda cheese in Canada in 2002 (Honish 2005) and the US in 2010 (CDC 2010). In the latter, at least 38 cases have been linked to consumption of Gouda cheese made with raw milk and presumably aged for 60 days in accordance with FDA regulations. The CDC summarized findings from the ongoing investigation in a November 24, 2010 report.
Microbiology
Johnson (2001) reviewed the microbiology of cheese products and noted the complexity of the subject because of the great diversity in cheese manufacturing and ripening protocols, as well as composition of the different cheese types. The 60-day aging rule is based on the theory that pathogens, if present, will die off to levels below the infectious dose during the aging process. However, the effectiveness of this system depends on the initial microbiological quality of the milk and other ingredients used, and the hygienic practices used during cheese processing (Donnelly 1990). No amount of curing or aging or even pasteurization will compensate for poor quality milk or lack of hygiene during manufacturing and storage. The intrinsic properties of the cheesemaking process that affect pathogen survival and growth include:
• pH• moisture• salt content• acidity• temperature• humidity• redox potential• cheese microbial flora including starter culture (microbial community)
Individually and in combination, these factors can have significant impacts on whether a foodborne pathogen survives or grows in cheese during curing. The effectiveness of these natural processes is ultimately dependent on the initial contamination level of the cheese. A high inoculum of a pathogen, especially one with a low infectious dose, will overwhelm these control systems. The soft and semi-soft surface-mold-ripened cheeses are at the greatest risk of contamination due to their higher pH and moisture content (D’Amico 2008a).
The presence of pathogens in milk used for production of raw milk cheeses represents a risk for consumers. Oliver (2009) reviewed the literature on pathogen prevalence in US bulk tank milk and found these levels.
• Campylobacter: 2 – 9.2 percent • E. coli O157:H7: 0 – 0.75 percent • Listeria monocytogenes: 2.8 – 7.0 percent • Salmonella spp: 0 – 11 percent • Shiga-toxin E. coli: 2.4 – 3.96 percent • Yersinia enterocolitica: 1.2 – 6.1 percent
D’Amico (2008b and 2010) surveyed milk used to produce small-scale farmstead cheese in Vermont and found an overall low level of contamination, but documented variations from farm-to-farm indicating that some operations practice strict hygienic controls while other need improvement in their food safety practices.
Experimental studies of the behavior of pathogens in aged cheese show mixed results (Bachmann 1995; Back 1993; D’Amico 2008a; D’Amico 2008b; D’Amico 2010; Govaris 2002; Marth 1969; Reitsma 1996; Schlesser 2006). The studies are difficult to compare because of different experimental methods, and variations in how the cheese was manufactured for the experiments. For example, Reitsma (1996) found viable E. coli O157:H7 in cheddar cheese at 158 days, but used pasteurized milk in their comparisons. Schlesser (2006) inoculated cheddar cheese with a 5-strain E. coli O157:H7 cocktail and demonstrated an inadequate reduction at 60 days (1 log) and 120 days (2 logs); in contrast, heat treating the milk resulted in a 5-log reduction. D’Amico (2010) examined the behavior of E. coli O157:H7 in aged Gouda and stirred-cured cheddar cheeses manufactured from raw milk and was able to recover viable cells for more than 270 days in both cheese types using selective enrichment.
Listeria monocytogenes can be a pervasive problem in the dairy processing environment. There is evidence that L. monocytogenes can survive aging in both pasteurized and surface-mold-ripened cheeses if the pathogen is introduced post-processing (D’Amico 2008b). These findings underscore the importance of hygienic practices at cheesemaking facilities regardless of pasteurization status. D’Amico (2008a) provides a more comprehensive review of experimental studies using different pathogens and cheese types.
Producing Cheese Safely
Unlike fluid raw milk producers who have been the subject of intense conflict with regulators for many years, artisanal and specialty cheesemakers that use raw milk have maintained a relatively good relationship with state and FDA regulators in the US. According to their website, the American Cheese Society (ACS) shares resources to help producers adequately prepare for audits and inspections and work collaboratively with state regulators and the FDA. The recent increase in FDA inspections and Listeria testing of soft cheeses and cheesemaking facilities has no doubt caused tensions between cheesemakers and regulators. The New York Times reports that FDA inspectors visited 102 facilities beginning in April 2010, including both large and small cheesemakers. They found Listeria in the facilities of 24 cheesemakers and more than half were small, artisan-scale operations.
While these findings are a cause for concern and have resulted in at least one major recall, fortunately, cheesemaking associations such as the ACS have an infrastructure to address food safety. For example, the ACS advises their members to:
• take part in ongoing food safety education• follow a HACCP plan• regularly conduct their own product and environment testing• maintain accurate and up-to-date records• seek third party certification• build relationships with local regulators
Conclusions
Artisanal raw milk cheeses are distributed around the world and revered by fans for their unique sensory characteristics, as well as the art and tradition of making these cheeses. Cheeses, especially fresh and soft or semi-soft styles, are susceptible to contamination with pathogens such as Campylobacter, E. coli O157:H7, Listeria monocytogenes, and Salmonella. Countries where raw milk cheeses are popular take different approaches in their regulations. Experimental and epidemiological evidence suggests that the 60-day aging rule used in the US and Canada is not a fail-safe approach to cheese safety, which has prompted the FDA to re-evaluate the efficacy of the rule and conduct a national survey of cheesemaking facilities.
There are at least four potential outcomes that may result from FDA’s recent actions: 1) a ban on all cheeses made from raw milk, 2) an extension of the 60-day aging period to 90-days or longer depending on evidence from the literature, 3) adoption of a European-type approach with intense regulation of animal health and hygiene during processing, but no aging rule, or 4) no change in the 60-day aging rule in the US. While the future of the 60-day aging rule for cheeses made from raw milk in the US remains to be determined, the openness of cheesemakers to working with state and federal regulatory agencies will hopefully foster a science-based approach to cheese safety that both protects the public’s health and preserves the unique characteristics and tradition of artisanal cheeses.
APPENDIX
Outbreaks, illnesses and recalls linked to cheeses made from raw (unpasteurized) and pasteurized milk, United States, 2010 (through November 2010): February 2010, Washington, Listeria monocytogenes, 5 ill, queso fresco cheese, pasteurized milk used to make the cheese, FDA February 2010, Washington, Listeria monocytogenes, 0 ill, various raw milk cheeses. 60-day aged raw milk cheeses from Montesano plant, FDA March 2010, Washington, Listeria monocytogenes, 0 ill, Tomme raw milk cheese. Expanded recall of 60-day aged raw milk cheeses from Montesano plant, FDA April 2010, Washington, Listeria monocytogenes, queso fresco cheese. Pasteurized milk used to make the cheese; recall with no illnesses reported, FDA May 2010, Nevada, Campylobacter, 1 ill, illegal Mexican-style cheese. Type of milk used to make the cheese unknown, Washoe County
May 2010, Minnesota, Shiga toxin-producing E. coli, 0 ill, raw milk cheese. Non-O157 found in dairy’s cheese during raw milk outbreak investigation, MDA/MDH June 2010, Delaware, Brucella and Listeria monocytogenes, 2 ill, raw dairy products including cheese. Two separate incidents, DE DHHS July 2010, Pennsylvania, Staphylococcus aureus, raw milk hard cheddar cheese, 60-day aged cheese, recall with no illnesses reported, PDA July 2010, New York, Listeria monocytogenes, queso fresco cheese, pasteurized milk used to make the cheese, recall with no illnesses reported, NY AGMKT August 2010, Rhode Island, Listeria monocytogenes, queso fresco cheese, pasteurized milk used to make the cheese, recall with no illnesses reported, RI DOH Aguust 2010, Misssouri, multiple Listeria monocytogenes and Staphylococcus aureus, raw milk cheese, 60-day aged raw milk cheese from plant in Missouri, recall with no illnesses reported, MO AG
September 2010, Washington, Listeria monocytogenes, 0 ill, raw milk cheeses, expanded recall of 60-day aged raw milk cheeses from Montesano plant, FDA
October 2010; Washington, Listeria monocytogenes; 0 ill; raw milk cheeses expanded recall of 60-day aged raw milk cheeses from Montesano plant, US AG
November 2010, AZ, CA, CO, NM, NV; E. coli O157:H7 and Listeria monocytogenes, 38 ill, raw Gouda cheese, other cheeses, 60-day aged Gouda, E. coli outbreak linked to Costco “Cheese Road Show;” recall expanded to all company cheeses on 11/17/10, no Listeria illnesses reported, CDC November 2010, Colorado; E. coli O157:H7, gorgonzola cheese, cheese imported from Italy, made from pasteurized milk, no illnesses reported, FDA
November 2010, Washingotn, Listeria monocytogenes, fresh (queso and ricotta) Mexican-style cheeses, made from pasteurized milk, no illnesses reported (previous recall from same plant in April 2010), FDA
Here is the full article by PDF – “The Raw Milk Beat Goes On: A Look at the Literature and the 60-Day Raw Milk Cheese Aging Rule”
References
1. Altekruse, S. F., B. B. Timbo, J. C. Mowbray, N. H. Bean, and M. E. Potter. 1998. Cheese-associated outbreaks of human illness in the United States, 1973 to 1992: sanitary manufacturing practices protect consumers. J Food Prot 61:1405-7.2. Bachmann, H. P., and U. Spahr. 1995. The fate of potentially pathogenic bacteria in Swiss hard and semihard cheeses made from raw milk. J Dairy Sci 78:476-83.3. Back, J. P., S. A. Langford, and R. G. Kroll. 1993. Growth of Listeria monocytogenes in Camembert and other soft cheeses at refrigeration temperatures. J Dairy Res 60:421-9.4. CDC. 2000. Outbreak of Escherichia coli O157:H7 infection associated with eating fresh cheese curds–Wisconsin, June 1998. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 49:911-3.5. CDC. 2001. From the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Outbreak of Listeriosis associated with homemade Mexican-style cheese–North Carolina, October 2000-January 2001. JAMA 286:664-5.6. CDC. 2008. Outbreak of multidrug-resistant Salmonella enterica serotype Newport infections associated with consumption of unpasteurized Mexican-style aged cheese–Illinois, March 2006-April 2007. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 57:432-5.7. CDC. 2009. Campylobacter jejuni Infection Associated with Unpasteurized Milk and Cheese — Kansas, 2007. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 57:1377-1379.8. CDC. OutbreakNet. Foodborne Outbreak Online Database. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/foodborneoutbreaks/Default.aspx9. CDC. 2010. Investigation Update: Multistate Outbreak of E. coli O157:H7 Infections Associated with Cheese. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/ecoli/2010/cheese0157/index.html10. Cody, S. H., S. L. Abbott, A. Marfin, B. Schulz, P. Wagner, K. Robbins, J. C. Mohle-Boetani, and D. J. Vugia. 1999. Two outbreaks of multidrug-resistant Salmonella serotype typhimurium DT104 infections linked to raw-milk cheese in Northern California. JAMA 281:1805-10.11. D’Amico, D. 2008a. Incidence, ecology, and fate of target foodborne pathogens in the cheesemaking continuum. University of Vermon. Available from: http://library.uvm.edu/jspui/bitstream/123456789/165/1/damicofinal.pdf12. D’Amico, D. J., M. J. Druart, and C. W. Donnelly. 2008b. 60-day aging requirement does not ensure safety of surface-mold-ripened soft cheeses manufactured from raw or pasteurized milk when Listeria monocytogenes is introduced as a postprocessing contaminant. J Food Prot 71:1563-71.13. D’Amico, D. J., E. Groves, and C. W. Donnelly. 2008c. Low incidence of foodborne pathogens of concern in raw milk utilized for farmstead cheese production. J Food Prot 71:1580-9.14. D’Amico, D. J., and C. W. Donnelly. 2010a. Microbiological quality of raw milk used for small-scale artisan cheese production in Vermont: effect of farm characteristics and practices. J Dairy Sci 93:134-47.15. D’Amico, D. J., M. J. Druart, and C. W. Donnelly. 2010b. Behavior of Escherichia coli O157:H7 during the manufacture and aging of gouda and stirred-curd cheddar cheeses manufactured from raw milk. J Food Prot 73:2217-2224.16. Deschenes, G., C. Casenave, F. Grimont, J. C. Desenclos, S. Benoit, M. Collin, S. Baron, P. Mariani, P. A. Grimont, and H. Nivet. 1996. Cluster of cases of haemolytic uraemic syndrome due to unpasteurised cheese. Pediatr Nephrol 10:203-5.17. Desenclos, J. C., P. Bouvet, E. Benz-Lemoine, F. Grimont, H. Desqueyroux, I. Rebiere, and P. A. Grimont. 1996. Large outbreak of Salmonella enterica serotype paratyphi B infection caused by a goats’ milk cheese, France, 1993: a case finding and epidemiological study. BMJ 312:91-4.18. De Valk, H., E. Delarocque-Astagneau, G. Colomb, S. Ple, E. Godard, V. Vaillant, S. Haeghebaert, P. H. Bouvet, F. Grimont, P. Grimont, and J. C. Desenclos. 2000. A community–wide outbreak of Salmonella enterica serotype Typhimurium infection associated with eating a raw milk soft cheese in France. Epidemiol Infect 124:1-7.19. Dominguez, M., N. Jourdan-Da Silva, V. Vaillant, N. Pihier, C. Kermin, F. X. Weill, G. Delmas, A. Kerouanton, A. Brisabois, and H. de Valk. 2009. Outbreak of Salmonella enterica serotype Montevideo infections in France linked to consumption of cheese made from raw milk. Foodborne Pathog Dis 6:121-8.20. Donnelly, C. W. 1990. Concerns of microbial pathogens in association with dairy foods. J Dairy Sci 73:1656-61.21. FDA. 21 C.F.R. Part 133–Cheeses and Related Cheese Products. Available from: http://law.justia.com/us/cfr/title21/21cfr133_main_02.html22. FDA. 21 C.F.R. Part 1240.61–Mandatory pasteurization for all milk and milk products in final package form intended for direct human consumption. Available from: http://law.justia.com/us/cfr/title21/21-8.0.1.5.48.4.1.2.html23. FSANZ. 2006. A risk profile of dairy products in Australia. Available from: http://www.foodstandards.gov.au/_srcfiles/P296%20Dairy%20PPPS%20FAR%20Attach%202%20FINAL%20-%20mr.pdf24. Govaris, A., D. K. Papageorgiou, and K. Papatheodorou. 2002. Behavior of Escherichia coli O157:H7 during the manufacture and ripening of feta and telemes cheeses. J Food Prot 65:609-15.25. Haeghebaert, S., P. Sulem, L. Deroudille, E. Vanneroy-Adenot, O. Bagnis, P. Bouvet, F. Grimont, A. Brisabois, F. Le Querrec, C. Hervy, E. Espie, H. de Valk, and V. Vaillant. 2003. Two outbreaks of Salmonella enteritidis phage type 8 linked to the consumption of Cantal cheese made with raw milk, France, 2001. Euro Surveill 8:151-6.26. Headrick, M. L., S. Korangy, N. H. Bean, F. J. Angulo, S. F. Altekruse, M. E. Potter, and K. C. Klontz. 1998. The epidemiology of raw milk-associated foodborne disease outbreaks reported in the United States, 1973 through 1992. Am J Public Health 88:1219-21.27. Honish, L., G. Predy, N. Hislop, L. Chui, K. Kowalewska-Grochowska, L. Trottier, C. Kreplin, and I. Zazulak. 2005. An outbreak of E. coli O157:H7 hemorrhagic colitis associated with unpasteurized gouda cheese. Can J Public Health 96:182-4.28. Jaros, P., N. Cogger and N. French. 2008. A systematic review of the human disease evidence associated with the consumption of raw milk and raw milk cheeses. A report prepared for the New Zealand Food Safety Authority (NZFSA). Availabel from: http://www.nzfsa.govt.nz/science/research-projects/final-report-rawmilk.pdf29. Johnson, M.E. 2002. Cheese products. In: Applied Dairy Microbiology, 2nd Ed., Marth, E. H. and J.L. Steele (eds), Ch. 11, p.345-384.30. MacDonald, P. D., R. E. Whitwam, J. D. Boggs, J. N. MacCormack, K. L. Anderson, J. W. Reardon, J. R. Saah, L. M. Graves, S. B. Hunter, and J. Sobel. 2005. Outbreak of listeriosis among Mexican immigrants as a result of consumption of illicitly produced Mexican-style cheese. Clin Infect Dis 40:677-82.31. Marler, W. 2009. Comparing the food safety record of pasteurized and raw milk products – Part 3. Available from: http://www.marlerblog.com/lawyer-oped/comparing-the-food-safety-record-of-pasteurized-and-raw-milk-products—part-3/32. Marth, E. H. 1969. Salmonellae and salmonellosis associated with milk and milk products. A review. J Dairy Sci 52:283-315.33. Oliver, S. P., K. I., Boor, S. C. Murphy, and S.e E. Murinda. 2009. Food safety hazards associated with consumption of raw milk. Foodborne Pathog Dis. 6:793-806.34. Ostyn, A., M. L. De Buyser, F. Guillier, J. Groult, B. Felix, S. Salah, G. Delmas, and J. A. Hennekinne. 2010. First evidence of a food poisoning outbreak due to staphylococcal enterotoxin type E, France, 2009. Euro Surveill 15.35. Reitsma, C. and D. H. Henning. 1996. Survival of enterohemmorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7 during the manufacture and curing of cheddar cheese. J Food Prot 59:460-464.36. Schlesser, J. E., R. Gerdes, S. Ravishankar, K. Madsen, J. Mowbray, and A. Y. Teo. 2006. Survival of a five-strain cocktail of Escherichia coli O157:H7 during the 60-day aging period of cheddar cheese made from unpasteurized milk. J Food Prot 69:990-8.37. Sheehan, J., R. Childers, and S. Clanci. 2004. Ask the regulators: enhancing the safety of dairy and other animal based foods. Available from: http://www.foodsafetymagazine.com/article.asp?id=1354&sub=sub138. Villar, R. G., M. D. Macek, S. Simons, P. S. Hayes, M. J. Goldoft, J. H. Lewis, L. L. Rowan, D. Hursh, M. Patnode, and P. S. Mead. 1999. Investigation of multidrug-resistant Salmonella serotype typhimurium DT104 infections linked to raw-milk cheese in Washington State. Jama 281:1811-6.39. Werner, S. B., G. L. Humphrey, and I. Kamei. 1979. Association between raw milk and human Salmonella dublin infection. Br Med J 2:238-41.
Food truck mania now has its own national website where foodies can find their favorite mobile vendors by metropolitan area.
Not surprisingly, Food Truck Locater is a Miami creation, the city where dinner at a bricks and mortar restaurant followed by a movie has been replaced by group bike rides from one food truck location to another.
Food Truck Locater went live with Scottsdale, AZ and Santa Barbara, CA in addition to South Florida. Developed by Artie Ayala, owner of Omni Media Group in Miami and a photographer and web designer, the new site lists food truck roundups.
Ayala took on the project as a food truck fan. His wife works for Food Cart U.S.A., a food truck manufacturer heavily involved in the promoting the fledgling industry.
The food truck manufacturer advertises it ability to build an all-new kitchen on the new truck chassis and then wrap it in a unique brand. It says it will build a food truck that accommodates any local or state health or food safety regulations.
Whether the food truck phenomenon is a fluke of the Great Recession, when would-be restaurateurs cannot get financing for establishments with regular addresses, or if it’s a another sign of our ever-more-mobile society remains to be seen.
At the moment, food trucks are trendy, generating business with Tweets and Facebook updates. The foodies who follow them are not concerned about food safety, especially when many of them are new with stainless steel kitchens turning out gourmet offerings.
In the Mile High City of Denver, where there is almost no place where you cannot get somebody to deliver “breakfast burritos” to your office or home, sometimes aging food carts and trucks have been around for years with 150 mobile food vendor licenses issued.
But it’s been the new upscale food trucks that have recently drawn the attention of local regulators. A “cupcake” truck was making too many stops in the wrong places and regular restaurants are concerned with where the new mobile competition is parking.
“I find it very funny that of all the immigrant vendors, who barely speak English, if at all, manage to follow these “confusing” rules with relative ease, while the Denver Cupcake owners were confused by the fact that there were rules,” commented local resident Patricia Calhoun in the Denver Post (DP). ”What did they think? That they were geniuses for coming up with an idea that they would roam the downtown and set up anywhere they thought fit with no regard for other vendors or restaurant owners.”
The Denver City Council last week put together a special committee to work with mobile food vendors on revised rules and regulations. In nearby Boulder, food trucks are not only trendy, but also politically correct. ”Great food taken to office parks, where otherwise you’d have to drive, so you’re saving carbon footprints,” Boulder’s Molly Winter told the DP. ”It’s a win-win.”
Food trucks are not yet competition with the finest restaurants, but some might be better options than fast food. Two recent to roads of California’s Orange County (OC) are Costa Mesa-based TK Burgers, which put a truck on OC’s roads to supplement its regular restaurant locations, and Go Country 105 (KKGO-FM) going into partnership with B Sweet Catering with “The Chuck Wagon.”
Such offerings can create an attraction. In South Florida ‘s West Kendall community, Friday nights are seeing a vacant lot turned into the Tamiami Truckers Food Court where food trucks called Cheese Me, Latin Burger, and others dispense the offerings to people who bring their own lawn chairs and music. It may be the cheap entertainment that some will remember as they did during the Great Recession. Or not.
Still, it’s best to check Twitter or Facebook, or the new national website, because with food trucks, locations are subject to change.
And regulators may be slow to figure that one out. Take Dupage County, IL, for example. New regulations went into effect there last August. The last requirement is: If changing location of operation with DuPage County, a Mobile Vender Information Form must be completed to update changes.”
Forms? Who needs forms?
Senate Finance Committee chairman Max Baucus (D-MT) is facing off with the White house over the pending South Korea free trade agreement because he wants loosened restrictions on U.S. beef imports.
“I’m not going to support the agreement unless there’s a change,” Baucus told the Wall Street Journal, after a hearing on Capitol Hill this week. Baucus believes the proposed agreement with South Korea, a priority for the Obama administration, doesn’t go far enough to relax restrictions and give the U.S. beef industry access to the country’s market. He’s also unhappy that cattle ranchers in Montana were left out of the deal.
The U.S. beef industry–which is important to Baucus’ home state–has worked feverishly to get back into South Korea without restrictions on exports since 2003 when the country banned American beef after a cow was found infected with Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (BSE), or mad cow disease, in Washington state.
Five years after the ban took effect, the South Korean government relaxed the restrictions to prohibit meat only from cows older than 30 months, which are perceived to be at higher risk of mad cow disease. The change in policy caused massive protests in the streets of Seoul, but U.S. beef imports doubled within a year.
In early December, South Korean Trade Minister Kim Jon Hoon closed the door on discussing the country’s stance on American beef restrictions. “It is our government’s firm position that there is no room for further discussions on it,” he told KBS radio in Seoul.
But the trade deal does phase out tariffs on a broad range of American agriculture products, including beef. The 40 percent tariff currently in place will be phased out over 15 years.
Though Baucus seems to be holding out for a better deal for ranchers, the American Meat Industry, along with over 60 industry trade groups and companies, is strongly urging Congress to approve the agreement (KORUS FTA) “without delay.”
“Risks for U.S. agriculture – and they are extremely serious – arise if the KORUS FTA is not implemented. If this agreement is rejected, we stand to relinquish our export sales to countries that have implemented their own FTAs with Korea,” the groups said in a letter sent to lawmakers in both chambers last week.
The American Meat Institute says it believes the agreement will increase U.S. beef, pork, and poultry exports by more than $2.1 billion.
Seafood processors in Miami, Albany, and Menomonie ran afoul of federal regulations late in 2010, bringing them recent warning letters from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
Snow crab in Miami, tuna loins and mahi mahi in Albany, and smoked trout in Menomonie were all found adulterated, according to FDA inspectors. Recently released warning letters tell why.
FDA sent a Dec. 22nd warning letter to Vistar Corporation because of “significant violations” of various federal food safety regulations at its seafood processing facility located in Miami.
FDA said Vistar’s frozen, cooked ready-to-eat Snow Crab, which is canned and pasteurized, and its frozen cooked lobster is adulterated. Specific Vistar’s violations include:
- Its seafood Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point plan does not address the length of the cooking cycle, temperature of the steam, and minimum-maximum size of the lobster being processed.
- Nor is Vistar’s HACCP plan include a critical limit time that is adequate to control for the hazard of pathogen growth during transit.
- Monitoring procedures for the length of the cooling cycle do not include the type of thermometer used, the method the monitor the length of the cycle, and the frequency for monitoring.
- The plan does not call for monitoring for the presence of sulfating agents.
- Sanitation monitoring was found lacking because an employee receiving ready-to-eat stone crab did not wash and sanitize his hands; products were allowed to come into contact with old chemical containers, and employees conducting cleaning operations did not use sanitizing solution.
FDA said Vistar’s response to the Form 483 was not provided within 15 days and was not filed in time to be responded to in the warning letter. It urged the company to respond within 15 days to the warning letter or face possible seizure of its adulterated products and/or enjoining the firm from operation.
Albany, NY-based D. Brickman Inc. received a Jan. 18 warning letter from FDA for “significant violations” involving its tuna loins and mahi mahi.
Under federal seafood regulations, D. Brickman must have an HACCP plan for each kind of fish or fishery product it produces. “However, your firm does not have an HACCP plan for tuna and mahi mahi to control the food safety hazard of scombrotoxin (histamine) formation,” the warning letter says.
FDA told the company it should respond in writing within 15 working days with documentation on how it is addressing the violation.
A Jan. 19 warning letter went out to the Bullfrog Fish Farm in Menomonie, WS over “serious violations” involving the production of its smoked trout products.
Among its HACCP plan violations, FDA told the Bullfrog Fish Farm that it does:
- not address the food safety hazard of undeclared allergens.
- not adequately address pathogen growth during storage.
- not have a record keeping system.
- not match temperature-recording logs with tracer logs.
- not monitor the safety of water that comes into contact with food or food contact surfaces; prevent cross contamination, and exclude pests from processing areas.
- not address the food safety hazard of aquaculture drugs, and
- not address misbranding due to use of a color additive.
Like the other two, the Wisconsin fish processor was given 15 working days to respond or face potential product seizure or being enjoined from operating.
A grade B dairy in Winthrop, MN owned by the giant milk-marketing cooperative known as Dairy Farmers of America was found contaminated with Salmonella senftenberg during a routine inspection.
It does not appear that anyone became ill from the dairy plant contamination.
In a Jan. 24 warning letter to the Kansas City-based Dairy Farmers of America, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration said environmental samples returned from an inspection last September were positive for Salmonella S.
“During the inspection FDA collected a sample of medium heat, extra grade non-fat dry milk powder, and a total of 106 environmental swabs were taken throughout your processing facility,” the warning letter says. ”Laboratory analysis of sample number 638534 confirmed the presence of Salmonella senftenberg in three environmental swabs.”
FDA did not disclose the exact source or location of the contamination.
“Salmonella senftenberg is a pathogenic organism that can cause serious and sometimes fatal infections in young children, frail or elderly people, and others with a weakened immune systems,” FDA continued. ”Healthy individuals may suffer short-term symptoms such as severe diarrhea, bloody diarrhea, fever, chills, adnominal discomfort, and occasionally vomiting.”
Grade A milk is sold for direct consumption for sale in retail stores; whereas Grade B milk is used to make other products like cheese. Grade A milk is subjected to more inspection.
The 15-year old Dairy Farmers of America, formed from a number of milk marketing cooperatives, represents more than 9,500 farms with 1.7 million cows. It owns 21 manufacturing plants, including three in Minnesota and Wisconsin.
The warning letter also called out Dairy Farmers of America (DFA) for a number of violations found during the inspection. Those included:
– DFA failed to clean or sanitize equipment in a manner that protects against contamination of food and food contact surfaces.
FDA said the high-pressure foamers being used to sanitize equipment could atomize microorganisms that will contaminate food, food contact surfaces or food packaging materials.
– DFA failed to clean and sanitize food contact surfaces with enough frequency to present the contamination of food.
– DFA employees failed to wash and sanitize their hands thoroughly in an adequate hand-washing facility.
FDA said Dairy Farmers of America did not adequately address its concern after the inspection, and gave it 15 works days from receipt of the warning letter to do so.
A Salinas, CA company is recalling fresh cilantro after Salmonella was detected during a USDA Microbiology Data Program test.
Sabor Farms said the cilantro was sold in California and “several other states” from Jan. 14-28 under the labels Nature’s Reward, Ocean Mist, Tanimura & Antle and Queen Victoria.
Consumers should note that the cilantro bunches do not contain identifying lot codes. Each bunch is sold with a distinctive, but general twist-tie for cilantro. Samples of the four relevant twist ties are pictured here.
For purposes of retailers and distributors, the packaging from which test samples were taken did have specific lot codes that allowed for product traceback to the specific farm and harvest dates (Jan. 13-14, 2011). The potentially affected products are:
– Nature’s Reward label 05013 22/ 16 10 and 05014 22/ 16 10,– Ocean Mist label 16 cisf 1j / 2 0113 11 and 16 cisf 1j / 2 011411,– Tanimura & Antle label 22 01 13 151348 and 22 01 14 151348 and– Queen Victoria label 16520142 / 16 10 22 and 16520132 / 16 10 22.
Sabor Farms has contacted the four companies that received potentially affected lots of cilantro and confirmed that no product remains in their inventories.
In a news release, Dr. Mark Horton, director of the California Department of Public Health (CDPH), said health officials are concerned that while the contaminated cilantro may no longer be available in retail stores, consumers may still have some in their homes. Consumers in possession of this contaminated cilantro should not eat it.
To date, no illnesses have been reported.
Symptoms of Salmonella infection include fever, abdominal cramps, and diarrhea which may be bloody. Most infected people recover within a week. Some may develop complications that require hospitalization. Infants, the elderly, and people with weakened immune systems are at highest risk for more severe illness. People who develop symptoms of Salmonella infection after consuming cilantro should consult their health care provider.
Consumers who have concerns may contact Sabor Farms at 831-970-9754 or by email at info@saborfarms.com .
Sabor Farms has received no complaints, but chooses to proactively withdraw any cilantro and to notify the public as a precautionary measure. Company president William Quinlan issued the following statement:
“The safety of our consumers is always our top priority. Period. Even though it is unlikely this would pose a health concern, we believe the prudent and proper course of action is to pull the product back. Using product and shipping codes, we are working closely with health officials as well as our distributors and wholesalers to quickly and efficiently locate and dispose of the cilantro. If there is any question about the source of cilantro you should discard it, and any items prepared with it.” Consumers who observe the product being offered for sale are encouraged to report the activity to the CDPH toll-free, complaint line at 800-495-3232.













